North Allegheny board OKs work to add turf, lights to intermediate high school field | TribLIVE.com
North Hills

North Allegheny board OKs work to add turf, lights to intermediate high school field

Tony LaRussa
921238_web1_WEB-north-allegheny-intermediate-high-school

The North Allegheny School Board has taken a step toward improving playing conditions for its sports teams by agreeing to resurface the field at the intermediate high school with artificial turf and add lighting.

In February the board considered a series of options to add turf and lighting to two fields at NAI that range in price from about $1.96 million to $8.1 million.

The board on March 20 selected the lowest-priced option, which will provide turf and lighting on the oval field as well as lighting to improve safety in the bus parking lots.

The lack of lighted fields covered in quick-draining artificial turf has made it difficult to schedule practices for the district’s teams,which frequently have to rent turf fields to get sufficient practice time.

Competition to use the turf field at Newman Stadium Stadium also regularly leads to practices that run late into the evening.

The board voted 7-2 to award a $1.6 million contract for site work and installation of the turf to Palumbo Landscaping; and a contract for $309,900 to A-1 Electric for the electrical portion of the work.

Voting to award the contracts were board members Richard McClure, Christopher Disque, Andrew Chomos, Kevin Mahler, Michael Meyer, Allyson Minton and Scott Russell. Board members Libby Blackburn and Christopher Finley voted against the measure.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | North Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.