North Hills’ spring musical ‘Tuck Everlasting’ receives 8 Kelly nominations |
North Hills

North Hills’ spring musical ‘Tuck Everlasting’ receives 8 Kelly nominations

Tony LaRussa
Louis Raggiunti | For the Tribune-Review
North Hills Zack Ford as “Jesse Tuck” performs in North Hills High School’s spring musical production of “Tuck Everlasting” on March 28, 2019.

North Hills High School’s spring musical “Tuck Everlasting” has garnered nominations in eight categories for the annual Gene Kelly Awards for Excellence in High School Musical Theater.

The show, which was performed at the high school in March, was nominated for:

• Best Musical

• Best Scenic Design

• Best All-Student Orchestra

• Best Crew/Technical Execution

• Best Execution of Choreography

• Best Execution of Music Direction

• Best Execution of Direction

• Best Supporting Actor — Tyler Dumas

Patterned after Broadway’s Tony Awards, the Pittsburgh CLO’s Kelly Awards will be presented at 7:30 p.m. May 25 at the Benedum Center.

In addition to performances and the more than 20 Kelly Awards that will be presented at the event, several cash and university scholarships will be announced. For tickets, call 412-456-6666.

The winners of this year’s Best Actor and Best Actress awards will travel to New York City to represent Pittsburgh in the Jimmy Awards on June 24.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | North Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.