Ross commissioner says no development planned for Cemetery Lane property |
North Hills

Ross commissioner says no development planned for Cemetery Lane property

Tony LaRussa
A social media post urging Ross residents to oppose a housing development on property owned by North Side Catholic Cemetery prompted township officials to send a letter to nearby residents informing them that no such development is proposed. Cemetery officials are seeking to subdivide the land for burial plots, according to the township.

A social media post calling on Ross residents to oppose a housing development on a 16-acre tract of land along Cemetery Lane prompted a township commissioner to issue a response on Wednesday clarifying that no such use is planned for the property.

“I and other township officials have received a number of telephone calls from residents saying that they are against the township allowing the property to be developed for housing,” said Commissioner Pat Mullin, who represents Ward 7, where the property is located.

“We’ve sent a letter to residents near the property informing them that the proposal has nothing to do with housing,” Mullin said. “It’s property owned by North Side Catholic Cemetery, which needs to subdivide the land in order to use it for burial plots.”

The area along Cemetery Lane is near the township’s public works garage and the entrance to Short Line Hollow Park.

The township’s letter, which also was posted on social media, states that the cemetery’s management has indicated that “at some point in the future (5 to 10 years) an additional mausoleum may be constructed.”

“The cemetery will not be creating a residential development and they have stated there are no plans to do so in the future,” according to the letter.

The call to action that was posted on social media urges residents to attend the March 28 planning commission meeting to speak out about the development and to contact township officials to lodge their opposition to future development in the area.

“Residents are always welcome to attend our meetings and to contact us with their concerns,” Mullin said. “But this is a case where somebody misunderstood what is happening and sort of jumped the gun because there are no plans to put housing up at that site.”

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | North Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.