ShareThis Page
North Hills

McKnight Elementary principal apologizes for failing to inform parents about threat

Tony LaRussa
| Thursday, March 1, 2018, 5:24 p.m.
McKnight Elementary School
McKnight Elementary School

The principal of an elementary school in the North Allegheny School District sent a letter to parents apologizing for failing to immediately inform them about a threat that was discovered in a bathroom.

The apology sent out on March 1 from Christopher Shute, principal at McKnight Elementary, informed parents that on Feb. 27 a student found a threatening message written in the third-grade girls' bathroom and informed her teacher, who notified building administration, according to a copy of the letter viewed by the Trib.

“During the course of the afternoon, an internal investigation was conducted to identify who the target of the message was in addition to the perpetrator,” Shute wrote in the letter. “Students were interviewed, teachers shared their insights and the hallway video was reviewed to compile information. After a thorough investigation, it was determined that the threat was not credible and the safety of students was never in jeopardy.”

Shute noted that while the families of the children involved were notified, others were not told about what happened.

“In hindsight, I realize that additional steps should have been taken to better inform all McKnight families,” Shute wrote.

Shute also said that while the threat “was immediately investigated to ensure student safety,” the incident was not relayed to his immediate supervisor or McCandless police.

“These steps should have been completed and I take personal responsibility for this oversight,” he said. “I apologize for the lack of communication to the McKnight community and understand the various emotions and frustrations this has caused.

“I will continue to take every threat seriously as the safety of our school remains my number one priority,” Shute wrote.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me