ShareThis Page
North Hills

Council hears from opponents, supporters of Sheetz's plan to move McCandless location

Tony LaRussa
| Tuesday, June 26, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

A request by Sheetz Inc. that town council alter its zoning law so it can move its current operation to a larger site across Perry Highway drew scores of residents to a public hearing last week.

Company officials said the Sheetz convenience store at the busy triangular junction of Old Perry Highway and Perry Highway lacks room to expand.

But residents who spoke at the hearing said they opposed the change because allowing a larger building closer to their homes will increase residents' exposure to gasoline and diesel fumes; add more noise, light and traffic congestion; make it more dangerous for kids waiting for school buses; lower nearby property values; and generally disturb the tranquility of their neighborhood.

Several people who came out in support of allowing the zoning change said moving the site across the road will cause little negative affect and might even lead to improvements to a part of town that needs to be rehabilitated.

At issue is the town's rule for the residential-commercial or “R-C” district that requires gasoline stations be at least 1,500 feet apart. Sheetz has requested that the language be altered to set the minimum distance at 1,500 feet from another gas station not located at the same signalized road intersection.

The R-C district runs along Route 19 from Prescott Drive to the McCandless/Ross border at Birch Avenue.

Michael Gronsky of Montclair Avenue said the zoning rule should not be changed because its intention was to “maintain the character” of the zoning district.

“The residents near any zoned district have a right to expect that they will be protected by the laws as they exist,” he said. “When we allow the laws to be changed by one party, after the fact ... it's like moving the goal posts once the game starts.”

Virginia Novak of Montclair Avenue said if Sheetz moves to the new location the value of her property will be diminished.

“We have absolutely no interest in living directly across the street from a mega Sheetz,” she said. “Having this gas station that is open 24 hours a day, 365 days a year will tremendously decrease our property value. How do you expect us to sell our homes in the future? Who would want to live here?”

Company officials noted that the zoning for the area proposed for the new store already allows gasoline stations and that the change in the language relating to how far apart they can be is “a limited request.”At a previous presentation before council, company representatives said the larger location and additional pumps will help cut traffic congestion by reducing the amount of time it takes to get in and out of the site. Plans also call for adding a dedicated turning lane and making traffic signal improvements.

Company officials have promised to work with the town and residents to develop lighting and landscaping plans that reduce the impact on nearby properties.

Ralph LeDonne of Peebles Road, a former town councilman and retired McCandless police chief, said concerns about property values might be unwarranted.

He noted that when the McIntyre Square shopping center along McKnight Road was developed more than three decades ago, people along his street and in the other nearby housing plans raised the same concerns about whether the project would lower the value of their homes.

“I was a real estate agent for 21 years during that period of time,” he said. “After it (the shopping center) was completed, the value of properties all escalated.”

Jonathan Bernstein of Highland Road said he lives near the current Sheetz location and has not experienced the kind of problems residents are anticipating if it is moved.

“My kids play out in the yard and we never smell gas,” he said. “We've never had an issue with noise keeping us up at night. Sheetz has been a good neighbor. I feel they have been responsible with how they manage things on their property.”

Bernstein said allowing the company to expand “would be a valuable asset to our community.”

Todd Rhule, owner of a heating and cooling company that would be next door to the new Sheetz, said the new building could help spur development of other commercial properties in the corridor where “the current buildings are all in a state of disrepair.”

Duquesne University law professor Joseph Sabino Mistick, who is a regular Tribune-Review contributing writer, spoke at the meeting on behalf of the developer.

He said using zoning to keep certain types of businesses separated from each other is an out-dated concept.

He noted that when zoning laws were first enacted in the 1920s “there were certain uses about which there was some uncertainty.”

“The thought was, if you spaced them you could spread the uncertainty around the community and see how that worked out,” he said.

But planners now reserve spacing requirements for things such as social service agencies, group homes, personal care and board houses and halfway houses.

“The thought is that concentrating them would have a deleterious affect on the community,” he said. “But as far as business uses, these days they are clustered instead of spaced.”The results of the public hearing will be reviewed at the town's zoning committee meeting July 9 and be up for formal consideration by council July 23.

If approved, the change would allow Sheetz to apply to build on the new site while letting the owner of the property currently leased by the company to continue using it, if they choose, as a gasoline station.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-772-6368 or tlarussa@tribweb.com or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me