ShareThis Page
North Hills

North Allegheny school board votes to fill key administrative position

Tony LaRussa
| Thursday, July 19, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

The North Allegheny school board recently filled the post for the newly created administrative position of director of curriculum, assessment and professional development.

The board voted unanimously at its July 18 meeting to hire Jillian Bichsel, the director of curriculum and assessment for the Chartiers Valley School District since 2014. Bichsel starting date has not yet been determined. Her annual salary will be $127,000 a year.

Bichsel replaces Tammy Andreyko who recently was hired as superintendent for the Quaker Valley School District.

Bichsel has a bachelor’s degree in English from Wittenberg University, a master’s degree in English education from Ohio State University, gifted education K-12 certification from Ashland University and a doctorate of education in school leadership from the University of Pittsburgh, where she also obtained principal K-12 certification and a superintendent’s letter of eligibility.

She began her career in education as a middle and high school English teacher in Ohio and Mississippi. She also has worked for the East Central Ohio Educational Services Center as well as the Indian Valley and Wooster City school districts in Ohio.

Bichsel then moved to Pennsylvania, where she has worked for the Quaker Valley, and Fox Chapel Area school districts before taking the job at Chartiers Valley.

“We are looking forward to Dr. Bichsel joining our team at North Allegheny,” said superintendent Robert Scherrer. “Her expertise will allow the district to continue to provide engaging and robust opportunities for both students and staff members.”

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368 or tlarussa@tribweb.com or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me