9 seek 5 spots in Norwin School Board race | TribLIVE.com

9 seek 5 spots in Norwin School Board race

Joe Napsha

With two school directors deciding not to seek re-election, the Norwin School Board will have at least two new faces on the board next year.

Three incumbents and six challengers are on the May 21 ballot in competition for five open seats. All nine candidates have cross-filed.

Directors Robert Perkins, a former board president, and Dennis Rittenhouse, have opted not to seek re-election. Each is completing a fifth term.

Incumbents Darlene Ciocca of North Huntingdon and Tracey Czajkowski of North Huntingdon are seeking re-election. Ciocca is seeking a third term while Czajkowski is seeking a second term. Ciocca and Czajkowski are both registered Republicans

Incumbent William Essay, a former North Huntingdon commissioner, was appointed to the school board in January by Westmore­land County Court. Essay was named to complete the term of Shawn Petrisko, who resigned in August. His resignation sparked a months-long split among board members who could not agree on a replacement.

Newcomers seeking a board seat are Democrats Robert Eagle­son, Kimberly Piekut and Patrick Lynn, all of North Huntingdon; and Republicans JoAnna Jordan and Robert Wayman, both of Irwin, and Keith Genicola.

Lynn and Piekut both sought the judicial appointment in January. Lynn is the son of former director Al Lynn. Wayman, a retired teacher, is a former mayor of Irwin.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.