Irwin residents seek parks upgrades, crackdown on speeders |

Irwin residents seek parks upgrades, crackdown on speeders

Joe Napsha

A group of about 30 Irwin residents told borough officials they want continued improvements to the parks, a crackdown on speeding vehicles along Pennsylvania Avenue and no more tax hikes.

“I was very impressed with the residents and the businessmen that came here and gave their input. Everybody had great ideas. We’re going to go back and takes those ideas and rate those (ideas),” council President Rick Burdelski said after a town hall forum at The Lamp Theatre in downtown Irwin.

Among the improvements under consideration for Irwin Park is the creation of a children’s splash park. It is on the agenda for 2020, Burdelski said.

Councilman Michael Yunn, who heads council’s parks and recreation committee, said the borough is researching what is required in terms of water pressure, amount of water needed and required drainage.

“It is in the infant stages of how the splash park would operate,” Yunn said.

The borough had a new updated playground installed earlier this year.

Improvements at Irwin Park have been an issue for several years.

Responding to a suggestion a parking lot at the park be paved, Yunn said the borough was denied a grant for that work.


Kim Perkins of Highland Avenue said she wanted to see a crackdown on motorists “that use Pennsylvania Avenue as a freeway.”

The drivers “just about run you over” in a rush to get to the stop sign at the intersection with Brush Hill Road, she said.

“We take our lives in our hands every time we walk” along Pennsylvania Avenue, Perkins said.

After the meeting, police Chief Roger Pivirotto said police do conduct checks for speeding vehicles along Pennsylvania Avenue.


Burdelski said the borough is committed to keeping its police force intact. The borough just approved a three-year contract with the union representing police.

“Without the police, we would not have the safe community or the events we have,” Burdelski said.

Problems with the parking meters not operating properly were also discussed.

“The parking meters are very old and expensive to replace,” Burdelski said.


Residents also told borough council the formerly proposed amusement tax, should not be revived. The proposed amusement tax would have set a levy on tickets sold at The Lamp and other venues in the borough not operated by a nonprofit charitable organization.

The controversial idea for a 5% levy on tickets was debated last year and then tabled. It was reconsidered in February, but dropped.


While members of the audience expressed what they wanted done in the borough, Councilwoman Gail Macioce said the borough needs people to volunteer to serve on the planning commission and zoning hearing board.

Macioce said volunteers also are needed on the Irwin Business and Professional Association, which organizes festivals in town, as well as the Irwin Rotary Club.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Sheila Jaskolski walks with Alexee Smith (left) and siblings Holdyn Schmidt and her brother Kane, along the walkway at Irwin Park.
Categories: Local | Norwin
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.