Assault, child endangerment charges filed against Wilkinsburg man in alleged Penn Hills incident |
Penn Hills

Assault, child endangerment charges filed against Wilkinsburg man in alleged Penn Hills incident

Dillon Carr

Charges were filed against a Wilkinsburg man who allegedly assaulted a 15-year-old.

Henry Yates, 56, was charged Oct. 3 after the girl was brought by her mother to the Penn Hills police station to report an alleged incident that happened at a Penn Hills house.

The teen was lying on a couch late at night when Yates joined her, according to court documents.

“(He) walked into the room, laid down beside her and began to touch her underneath her clothing,” a criminal complaint filed against him said.

The complaint said the interaction lasted for about 10 minutes before Yates walked to another room and fell asleep. The teen told police she was frightened.

When police interviewed Yates, the criminal complaint said he admitted to drinking that night while on medication.

“He only remembers details prior to and after the alleged indecent assault,” the criminal complaint said.

Yates faces charges of endangering the welfare of children, corruption of minors, unlawful contact with a minor and indecent assault to a person less than 16 years old.

Yates’ public defender, Domenic J. Pietropaolo, was not immediately available to comment.

Court records show a nonmonetary bail was set Oct. 3. Yates is scheduled to face an Allegheny County court judge on Dec. 26.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.