Assault, drug cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca’s Penn Hills court | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Assault, drug cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca’s Penn Hills court

Michael DiVittorio
1775749_web1_GavelNewN

Penn Hills District Judge Anthony L. DeLuca handled the following cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Charges were filed by Penn Hills police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

• Thomas Pirollo, 28, of Penn Hills on charges of accident involving death or personal injury, accident involving damage to attended vehicle or property, driving an unregistered vehicle, driving with a suspended license, operating a vehicle without required financial responsibility and careless driving. Charges were filed June 26.

• David Abbott III, 27, of Penn Hills on charges of terroristic threats, simple assault and harassment. Charges were filed July 5.

• Lazaro Marin, 33, of Stubenville, Ohio on three counts of firearms not to be carried without a license and four counts of persons not to possess firearms. Charges were filed July 24.

• William Randolph, 55, of Penn Hills on charges of aggravated assault. Charges were filed Sept. 13.

Waived preliminary hearings

• Crystal Banks, 49, of Rankin on charges of retail theft. Wilkins police filed the charges Jan. 10.

• Sean Doran, 28, of Greensburg on charges of possession of controlled substances. Charges were filed July 2.

• Cody Proctor, 26, of Turtle Creek on charges of driving under the influence, duties at stop sign and reckless driving. Wilkins police filed the charges July 28.

• Robert Mushinsky Jr., 48, of Pittsburgh on charges of driving under the influence. Charges were filed Aug. 18.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.