Assault, DUI cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca’s Penn Hills court | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Assault, DUI cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca’s Penn Hills court

Michael DiVittorio
1504222_web1_GavelNewN

Penn Hills District Judge Anthony L. DeLuca handled the following cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Charges were filed by Penn Hills police unless otherwise noted.

Waived preliminary hearings

• Michael Spears, 26, of New Kensington on charges of accident involving damage to attended vehicle/property, driving under the influence, possession of drug paraphernalia, reckless driving and accident involving damage to unattended vehicle/property. Charges were filed May 12.

• Carol Owens, 31, of New Kensington on charges of driving under the influence. Charges were filed May 29.

• Aviva Wander, 23, of Plum on charges of driving under the influence, driving with a suspended license and careless driving. Wilkins police filed the charges May 25.

• Natasha Ceville, 27, of Wilkinsburg on charges of resisting arrest, disorderly conduct, harassment and two counts of simple assault. Charges were filed July 2.

• Geonte Turner, 23, of Pittsburgh on charges of attempted burglary, attempted criminal trespass, terroristic threats, criminal mischief and intimidating a witness/victim to refrain from report. Charges were filed July 20.

• Darrell Tigney Jr., 32, of Pittsburgh on charges of terroristic threats. Charges were filed Dec. 23.

• Rayshaun Dumas, 19, of Pittsburgh on charges of terroristic threats, firearms not to be carried without a license, harassment and two counts of simple assault. Charges were filed July 22.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.