ShareThis Page
Assault, theft cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca’s Penn Hills court | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Assault, theft cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca’s Penn Hills court

Michael DiVittorio
833578_web1_web-courts9

Penn Hills District Judge Anthony L. DeLuca handled the following cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Charges were filed by Penn Hills police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Frank Harris, 31, of Penn Hills on charges of criminal mischief and reckless driving. Charges were filed Nov. 5.
  • Dajuan Davis, 32, of Homestead on charges of theft of leased property. Charges were filed Nov. 12.
  • Chequel Saddler, 34, of Monroeville on charges of theft of leased property. Charges were filed Nov. 12.
  • Yasmine Oden, 21, of Penn Hills on charges of interference with custody of children. Charges were filed Feb. 5.
  • Darci Cincarik, 35, of Verona on charges of aggravated assault, terroristic threats, simple assault and harassment. Charges were filed Feb. 6.
  • Devonte Johnson, 24, of Sharon on charges obstructing administers of the law, driving an unregistered vehicle, providing false identification to law enforcement and driving without a license. Charges were filed Feb. 26.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Desra Johnson, 59, of Penn Hills on charges of driving under the influence, criminal mischief and trespass by motor vehicle. Charges were filed Dec. 2.
  • Kristie Robshaw, 29, of Verona on charges of harassment and two counts of simple assault. Charges were filed Jan. 14.
  • Jason Arthurs, 32, of Penn Hills on charges of driving under the influence and following too closely. Charges were filed Jan. 20.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.