ShareThis Page
DUI, theft cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca’s Penn Hills court |
Penn Hills

DUI, theft cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca’s Penn Hills court

Michael DiVittorio

Penn Hills District Judge Anthony L. DeLuca handled the following cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Charges were filed by Penn Hills police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Karla Zenmon, 63, of Penn Hills on charges of driving under the influence and disregard traffic lane. Charges were filed March 3.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Christopher Strothers, 37, of Penn Hills on charges of theft by unlawful taking and access device used to obtain property or services. Charges were filed Sept. 21.
  • Brian Dukes, 35, of Pittsburgh on charges of firearms not to be carried without a license and access involving damage to unattended vehicle or property. Charges were filed Jan. 23.
  • Ethan Moyer, 27, of Pittsburgh on charges of fleeing or attempting to elude officer, driving with a suspended license, failure to stop at red signal, driving at unsafe speed, reckless driving, improper sunscreening and possession of controlled substances. Charges were filed March 29.
  • Janfong Robinson, 52, of Pittsburgh on two counts of bad checks. Charges were filed July 16.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.