4 new Penn Hills police officers bring department total to 49 | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

4 new Penn Hills police officers bring department total to 49

Dillon Carr
Dillon Carr | Tribune-Review
Penn Hills’ mayor and council welcome four new officers to the Penn Hills Police Department during a March 18 council meeting. From left are Councilman Mark Brodnicki, Deputy Mayor Catherine Sapp, Mayor Sara Kuhn, Amanda Duncan, Kevin Persichetti, Jacob Smith, James Spade, Councilman John Petrucci, Chief Howard Burton and Councilman Gary Underwood.

The Penn Hills mayor swore in four new police officers during a March 18 council meeting.

Amanda Duncan, Keven Persichetti, Jacob Smith and James Spade gave their oath before council members and family.

The officers will be in training for six months before starting their service under an additional six-month probationary period, said police Chief Howard Burton.

The addition brings the Penn Hills Police Department to a total of 49 officers. Burton said the department is budgeted for 53, and he plans to hire three more later this year.

Mayor Sara Kuhn said she was pleased to welcome the four officers to the force and offered a warning.

“Please remember, don’t take chances that are unnecessary. Your family wants you to come home to them every night just like everyone else comes home to theirs,” Kuhn said.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.