Only 2 people are on the ballot for 5 seats in Penn Hills School District primary |
Penn Hills

Only 2 people are on the ballot for 5 seats in Penn Hills School District primary

Michael DiVittorio
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Penn Hills School Board member Rob Marra, right, is running for reelection while fellow member Cathy Mowry, left, is not.
Penn Hills School Board President Erin Vecchio, right, is running for reelection.
Penn Hills School Board President Erin Vecchio, right, is running for reelection.

Not many Penn Hills residents want a chance to lead their school district.

That is evident via Allegheny County Elections Division records, which show only two people have filed for five seats in the May 21 primary election.

Incumbents board President Erin Vecchio and School Director Bob Marra have cross-filed.

The other three four-year seats up for grabs are currently occupied by Cathy Mowry, Vice President George Sens and his wife, Jan. None are on the ballot.

Vecchio is in her fourth nonconsecutive term. She said the potential for a state takeover of the district may be keeping potential school directors at bay.

“Nobody wants to get involved with the school district as messed up as it is,” Vecchio said. “I just find it really disturbing that no one got a petition to run and fight for their community. It’s unheard of. They’re all ready to (complain), but nobody wants to run. I’m not giving up. I’ve lived here my whole life. I know things can be fixed.”

The district’s more than $172 million in debt largely due to high school and elementary school construction projects.

It was placed in financial recovery status by the state Department of Education. Daniel Matsook has been assigned as its recovery officer. A recovery plan is expected to be made public in May and voted on in June.

The state could take over the district if the plan is not approved.

Marra said he doesn’t know why people decided not to run for school board, but doesn’t believe the state’s actions were a factor.

“I was a little surprised there were not more people running,” Marra said. “I was hoping some people would put their name in as possible write-in candidates or maybe try to get on the ballot another way. I’m hoping there will be some people that agree to run as write-ins, otherwise we have to appoint (board members).”

Residents can earn the Democratic or Republican nod to be on the November ballot for the seats via write-in votes.

County elections officials said write-in candidates must get at least 10 votes and be among the top five vote-getters to be on the ballot.

Jan Sens was recently appointed to the board to fill the unexpired term of former President Denise Graham-Shealey, who resigned her elected post to pursue social justice efforts.

Jan Sens will serve through early December when the board reorganizes.

She said she wanted to be on the board to help the district and her husband, who is not running for reelection due to health concerns.

A retired cafeteria worker and former custodial and maintenance union president, Jan Sens said she is undecided on a write-in campaign. She notes that politics can be brutal.

“I am concerned,” she said. “People are very cruel and outspoken when they don’t know your background, don’t know you thoughts and a don’t want to give you a chance. I knew what it was like to work for the school district, and I also sat in the audience (during board meetings).”

Mowry did not return a call seeking comment.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.