ShareThis Page
Penn Hills attorney joins councilman in mayoral bid | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Penn Hills attorney joins councilman in mayoral bid

Dillon Carr
948292_web1_php-calabresemayor1-041119
Pauline Calabrese

A Penn Hills attorney has thrown her name in the race to become the municipality’s next mayor.

Pauline Calabrese, 57, a Democrat, joins Penn Hills Councilman John Petrucci, also 57 and a Democrat, as a candidate for the open seat. Current Mayor Sarah Kuhn will not seek re-election.

Calabrese practices family law for Notaro & Associates in Downtown Pittsburgh. She said she served for more than a decade as a professor at Carlow University teaching employment discrimination law and business law. She also serves on the faculty for CCAC.

The attorney served as a Penn Hills school board member from 2014-17 and ran unsuccessfully to be a judge on the Allegheny Court of Common Pleas in 2015 and 2017.

If elected as mayor, Calabrese wants to revitalize Penn Hills.

“We need to make Penn Hills both a throughway and a destination,” she said, referencing Rodi Road and Allegheny River Boulevard as “natural gateways” she wants to use to create a robust economic base.

“Our residents continue to go elsewhere to work, shop and dine — even go elsewhere to buy a shirt and pants — and I would like to bring all of that back to Penn Hills,” Calabrese said.

She said she is in favor of resuming twice monthly council meetings and having two town hall meetings “at least twice a year.”

Calabrese lives in Penn Hills with her husband, also an attorney, and five children.

The primary for municipal elections is May 21.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.