Penn Hills fines man $4,800 for illegal dumping |
Penn Hills

Penn Hills fines man $4,800 for illegal dumping

Dillon Carr
Penn Hills Municipal Manager Scott Andrejak at the municipality’s Press Conference on illegal dumping on Wednesday morning, July 10.
Penn Hills District Court

A man caught on camera illegally dumping furniture and debris on a Penn Hills residential street was found guilty during a summary trial Thursday and fined nearly $5,000.

Aaron Evans, 35, of Wilkinsburg, said he plans to appeal a district judge’s decision that means he now owes a maximum fine of $2,000 for the offense, plus another $2,800 to clean up the dump site on Beechford Road where he was captured dumping debris in May.

For his defense, Evans did not deny the charge — he admitted guilt and apologized.

“It’s obviously wrong what I did, but I’m just saying it was handled inappropriately,” Evans said, referencing Penn Hills’ new strategy to address illegal dumping in the municipality, from which four have been publicly identified since July. As a result of the “public shaming,” Evans said he lost his job, was assaulted and harassed.

Evans’ charges and subsequent levied fines follow the municipality’s launching of a program aimed at cracking down on the issue.

Council increased the maximum fine for dumping from $500 to $2,000 and the municipality purchased and installed video cameras to place at some of the municipality’s numerous sites.

Scott Andrejchak, the municipality’s manager, said he and Penn Hills’ administration is committed to solving the dumping problem.

“Dumping does not just have one victim — it affects an entire neighborhood. Penn Hills will continue to identify and charge individuals that do this in our community,” Andrejchak said in a statement released Aug. 12 when the municipality identified a fourth man alleged to have illegally dumped in Penn Hills.

District Judge Anthony DeLuca said he believes Evans would still be dumping if he wasn’t caught on camera. He said the municipality sponsors clean-up days only to find the streets littered again two days later.

“Something like this, it takes time and energy to clean this up. And it’s cost taxpayer dollars,” DeLuca said.

Evans, who was not represented by an attorney, said Penn Hills code enforcement should devote more time and energy on fighting blight in the western portion of the municipality – near the Lincoln Park neighborhood – instead of coming after “a man who made a mistake that was trying to support my family.”

He acknowledged he previously worked for an “unscrupulous employer” who hired him to drive to Penn Hills with a box-truck full of waste to dump it.

“I wish there was consistency to which streets are maintained in Penn Hills,” he told the judge. In an interview after the hearing, Evans declined to provide details about his previous employer that hired him to dump.

Three other men — Ricky Stallworth Jr. of Wilkinsburg, Michael Smith of Carnegie and Teron Allen of Verona — also face charges and fines.

Evans, according to court records, was placed on a monthly payment plan of $400 to pay the $4,800 fines.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.