Penn Hills man sentenced to 15 years in prison for role in drug distribution network | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Penn Hills man sentenced to 15 years in prison for role in drug distribution network

Michael DiVittorio
1431016_web1_gavel

A Penn Hills man has been sentenced in federal court to 15 years in prison for his role in a drug distribution network.

Angelo Massie, 41, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer in Pittsburgh.

Authorities said Massie conspired with others to distribute more than a kilogram of heroin from November 2015 through September 2016.

Massie also must serve 10 years of supervised release following his prison sentence.

The drug investigation used wiretaps and other techniques to discover several interrelated drug distribution networks reaching Western Pennsylvania, parts of Ohio, Michigan and the Virgin Islands.

Authorities said an FBI task force began work in early 2015 on a drug trafficking organization operating on Pittsburgh’s North Side. It was

able to track drug suppliers beyond the borders of their own district and across the Caribbean Sea.

The Allegheny County District Attorney Narcotics Enforcement Team, as well as the state Attorney General’s Bureau of Criminal Investigations contributed to the investigation that resulted in Massie’s sentence.

This case grew out of a federally administered task force investigation that resulted in several federal indictments in August 2016.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.