Penn Hills police officer honored at Amen Corner Law Enforcement Luncheon | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Penn Hills police officer honored at Amen Corner Law Enforcement Luncheon

1912213_web1_php-amencorner-111419
Submitted
Penn Hills Police Department Patrolman Jared Rothert received the Line of Fire Award. It was presented by Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. Pictured, from left to right, are Judge Mary P. Murray, Jared Rothert, Stephen A. Zappala Jr., and Larry Dunn.

Amen Corner, a local non-political, non-partisan civic organization that was founded in 1870, held its 19th Annual Sen. John Heinz Law Enforcement Luncheon took place Nov. 1 at the Sheraton Station Square Hotel Ballroom.

More than 30 law enforcement men and women from Allegheny, Beaver, and Washington counties were honored for their heroic bravery and dedication above and beyond the call of duty.

According to a news release, Penn Hills Police officer Jared Rothert received the Line of Fire Award for using self-defense to stop the suspect in a robbery turned homicide in Penn Hills in July.

In addition, Special Critical Incident Response Awards were presented to the Special Teams who risked their lives responding to the Tree of Life Shooting: City of Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, Allegheny County Police Department, Allegheny County Sheriff’s Department, Pennsylvania State Police, North Hills Special Response Team and the SHACOG Critical Incident Response Team.

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.