Penn Hills students recognized for anti-littering artwork | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Penn Hills students recognized for anti-littering artwork

Dillon Carr
1205628_web1_art-supplies

Six Penn Hills students won top honors this year for their artistic renderings of anti-littering messages depicted on posters and coloring pages.

Alexandria Shields, a senior at Penn Hills High School, won first place for her poster playing on the “Penn Hills — Home of Champions — Keep It Clean!” theme.

Shields, along with other poster winners, will receive a gift at an awards ceremony June 1 at the Penn Hills Library.

A total of 425 students in K-12 grades participated in the program headed by Andrea Getsy of the Crescent Hills Civic Association.

Other winners included elementary students Wisdom Fayomi, Oscar Salinas and Ryan Michael Gomez. In middle school, the winners were Genevere Jerez-Lopez and Cassidy Carroll.

“With all of the folks that are picking up litter, the popular refrain has been, ‘how can we get this to stop?’” Getsy said. “The answer is we have to educate the younger generation, to make them understand that it’s wrong.”

The poster program joined forces with the Penn Hills Anti-Litter Program this year to also include an essay contest, in which students wrote responses to the questions: “How does litter negatively affect a community or your community?” and “What can I do to help keep my community clean or to help clean it up?”

The winners and runners-up will receive $50 gift baskets or gift cards. Many of the posters are displayed at the Penn Hills Library and at 75 local businesses.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.