Wilkinsburg man caught illegally dumping in Penn Hills again | TribLIVE.com
Penn Hills

Wilkinsburg man caught illegally dumping in Penn Hills again

Dillon Carr
Penn Hills Municipal Manager Scott Andrejak at the municipality’s Press Conference on illegal dumping on Wednesday morning, July 10.

Penn Hills charged and fined a Wilkinsburg man Friday they say illegally dumped on Beechford Road on two separate occasions.

Ricky Stallworth Jr., 34, of Wilkinsburg was charged July 8 for dumping debris, furniture and garbage on Beechford Road. He was also charged on July 12 for incidents that occurred in May and again in early July.

He now faces two separate fines amounting to $4,000, plus clean-up costs.

The charge is the latest in a string by Penn Hills Code Enforcement after it declared war on illegal dumpers on July 8, when it charged and fined Stallworth and two other men.

The municipality’s new strategy includes placing eight cameras at common dump illegal sites in Penn Hills, increasing the fines to a maximum of $2,000 and installing signs at dump sites that warn offenders of fines and the use of cameras.

Penn Hills Manager Scott Andrejchak said he and council members are looking into the possibility of changing Penn Hills’ ordinance to allow it to file criminal offenses instead of civil.

“Penn Hills will continue to identify, charge and sanction those who dump illegally in the community,” Andrejchak said. “The municipality and government center are committed to fighting a war against illegal dumping no matter how long it takes to win — we will prevail.”

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Penn Hills
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.