ShareThis Page
Penn Hills

Former Penn Hills School Board member waives preliminary hearing on drug charges

Michael DiVittorio
| Wednesday, May 31, 2017, 4:12 p.m.

A former Penn Hills School Board member waived a preliminary hearing on simple drug possession charges on May 31.

Don Kuhn Jr., 55, of Penn Hills, will face trial on three counts of possession of controlled substances after the waiver before Mt. Lebanon District Judge Blaise P. Larotonda.

The Allegheny County District Attorney's Office withdrew two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia.

Kuhn and his attorney both declined comment after the hearing.

County sheriff's deputies picked up Kuhn on March 23 at Linton Middle School in Penn Hills on a bench warrant issued by county Judge Jill Rangos, who apparently is overseeing the Allegheny County grand jury investigation into the school district's finances. Kuhn later said he had failed to appear before Rangos.

Deputies took Kuhn to the Dormont Municipal Building, where grand jury sessions are held. During a search, deputies allegedly found the following in Kuhn's pockets:

• Three stamp bags containing heroin residue.

• Four pieces of paper containing cocaine residue.

• One pill of Vicodin, a prescription painkiller.

The charges are all misdemeanors.

Kuhn's resigned from his board seat on April 24.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367, or via Twitter at @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me