ShareThis Page
Penn Hills

Thefts lead Penn Hills police activity

Dillon Carr
| Thursday, Sept. 7, 2017, 3:36 p.m.
Penn Hills Police SUV
Penn Hills Police SUV

The Penn Hills Police Department responded to these complaints Aug. 30-Sept. 5:

Animal problems

• Blackadore Avenue, Sept. 1

• Howard Street, Sept. 3

• Dashwood Drive, Sept. 4

Assault

• Bale Drive, Sept. 3

• Parkridge Drive, Sept. 3

• Overbrook Road, Sept. 3

• Pennview Drive, Sept. 4

Criminal mischief

• Hunter Road, Aug. 30

• Lime Hollow Road, Sept. 1

• Lincoln Road, Sept. 2

• Main Street, Sept. 2

• School Street, Sept. 2

• Nelbon Avenue, Sept. 4

• Palm Avenue, Sept. 4

• Verona Road, Sept. 4

• Frankstown Road, Sept. 5

DUI

• Saltsburg Road, Sept. 2

Drug activity

• Collins Drive, Aug. 30

• Leechburg Road, Aug. 31

• Peridot Drive, Aug. 31

Fraud

• Shannon Heights Drive, Aug. 29

• McKenzie Drive, Aug. 30

• Guylyn Drive, Sept. 5

Harassment

• Jefferson Road, Aug. 29

• Tremont Street, Sept. 1

• Highland Road, Sept. 2

• Hamil Road, Sept. 3

• Lott Road, Sept. 4

Hit-and-run

• North Joslyn Drive, Aug. 30

• Frankstown Road, Sept. 1

• Old William Penn Highway, Sept. 2

• Frankstown Road, Sept. 5

Theft/burglary/robbery

• Key Drive, Aug. 29

• Frankstown Road, Aug. 29

• Westwood Road, Aug. 31

• Mt. Carmel Road, Aug. 31

• Suncrest Drive, Sept. 1

• Overbrook Road, Sept. 3

• Deerfield Drive, Sept. 4

• Idlewood Road, Sept. 4

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me