ShareThis Page
Penn Hills

Drug and theft cases among those recently handled by Judge DeLuca in Penn Hills

Michael DiVittorio
| Wednesday, May 9, 2018, 3:45 p.m.
Getty Images

Penn Hills District Judge Anthony L. DeLuca handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Charges were filed by Penn Hills police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

• Colleen Vogeding, 29, of Apollo with theft by unlawful taking. The charge was filed March 17.

• Cerick Seibles, 18, of Braddock with receiving stolen property, firearms not to be carried without a license, possession with intent to deliver and possession of controlled substances. Charges were filed April 5.

• Jakeem Booker, 18, of Braddock with possession of controlled substances and possession with intent to deliver. Charges were filed April 5.

• Brian Scott Beaufort, 47, of Penn Hills with providing false identification to law enforcement and possession of controlled substances. Charges were filed April 23.

• Aaron Dion Germany, 30, of Penn Hills with simple assault, strangulation and harassment. Charges were filed April 28.

Waived preliminary hearings

• Amanda Nikkole Ralph, 26, of Pittsburgh with terroristic threats and harassment. Charges were filed Nov. 13, 2016.

• Craig Leith, 31, of Pittsburgh with conspiracy. The charge was filed April 5.

• Cayla Lee Coyne, 30, of Verona with illegal park stand double and driving under the influence. Charges were filed April 5.

• Javar Douglass-Thomas, 37, of Pittsburgh with driving under the influence and two counts of accident involving damage to unattended vehicle or property. Charges were filed April 13.

• Kenneth Moone-Parrotte, 25, of Pittsburgh with possession of controlled substances, tampering with physical evidence, possession of marijuana, turning movements and required signals and improper stop. Charges were filed April 18.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me