ShareThis Page
Penn Hills

Assault, drug cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca's Penn Hills court

Michael DiVittorio
| Monday, Aug. 6, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

Penn Hills District Judge Anthony L. DeLuca handled the following cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Charges were filed by Penn Hills police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Martin Terrick, 48, of Munhall on charges of simple assault. Charges were filed April 19.
  • Shaquille Howard, 24, of Penn Hills on charges of receiving stolen property, person not to possess firearms and two counts of possession of controlled substances. Pittsburgh police filed the charges April 27.
  • Paul Jacob Mioduski, 37, of North Braddock on charges of receiving stolen property, possession of drug paraphernalia, intentionally accepts possession of firearm from person with active protection from abuse order, six counts of possession of controlled substances and four counts of possession with intent to deliver. Charges were filed July 22.
  • Catherine Anne Wilson, 39, of North Braddock on charges of receiving stolen property, possession of drug paraphernalia, six counts of possession of controlled substances and four counts of possession with intent to deliver. Charges were filed July 22.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Desiree Andrews, 32, of Wilkinsburg on charges of driving under the influence and driving with a suspended license. Charges were filed April 30.
  • Lacey Lee Jones Jr., 52, of Penn Hills on charges of aggravated assault, obstructing of administers of the law and resisting arrest. Charges were filed July 13.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, mdivittorio@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me