ShareThis Page
Penn Hills

Drug, DUI cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca's Penn Hills court

Michael DiVittorio
| Monday, Sept. 17, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

Penn Hills District Judge Anthony L. DeLuca handled the following cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Charges were filed by Penn Hills police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • D’Andre Spencer, 27, of Verona on charges of simple assault and harassment. Charges were filed March 15.
  • Antoinette Saunders, 40, of Wilkinsburg on charges of criminal trespass and public drunkenness. Charges were filed March 15.
  • Jamaine Williams, 22, of Penn Hills on charges of possession with intent to deliver, possession of controlled substances, possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. Charges were filed May 18.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Chelcy Harris, 19, of Penn Hills on charges of criminal mischief. Charges were filed May 29.
  • Obayhana Wright, 46, of Penn Hills on charges of forgery. Wilkins Township police filed the charges July 5.
  • Richard White, 51, of Pittsburgh on charges of statement under penalty, tampering with public records, fraudulent insurance documents and fraudulent title. State police filed the charges July 11.
  • Martin Oconnell, 61, of Pittsburgh on charges of simple assault, two counts of harassment and three counts of disorderly conduct. Wilkins Township police filed the charges Aug. 4.
  • Robert Eveleth, 56, of Gibsonia on charges of driving under the influence and careless driving. Charges were filed Aug. 2.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, mdivittorio@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me