ShareThis Page
Penn Hills

Assault, drug cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca's Penn Hills court

Michael DiVittorio
| Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2018, 7:42 p.m.
Getty Images

Penn Hills District Judge Anthony L. DeLuca handled the following cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Charges were filed by Penn Hills police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Robert Burks-Kelly, 21, of Pittsburgh on charges of simple assault and harassment. Charges were filed Nov. 21.
  • Shane Mains, 24, of Turtle Creek on charges of simple assault, harassment and two counts of terroristic threats that caused the evacuation of a building. Verona police filed the charges Sept. 9.
  • David Cochran, 35, of Murrysville on three counts of tampering with public records or information and three counts of providing unsworn falsification to authorities. State police filed the charges Oct. 1,

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Jennifer Simpson, 39, of Penn Hills on charges of driving under the influence and careless driving. Charges were filed May 21.
  • Shane Shank, 29, of Penn Hills on charges of possession of controlled substances and possession with intent to deliver. Allegheny County Sheriff’s office filed the charges June 28.
  • John Mandella, 39, of Penn Hills on charges of simple assault and harassment. Charges were filed Sept. 30.

Mandella went before the judge on another case. He waived a preliminary hearing on charges of simple assault. Charges were filed July 8.

  • Dennis Davis, 46, of Arnold on charges of possession of controlled substances. Charges were filed Sept. 7.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me