ShareThis Page
Penn Hills

Assault, harassment cases among those recently handled in Judge DeLuca's Penn Hills court

Dillon Carr
| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

Penn Hills District Judge Anthony L. DeLuca handled the following cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Charges were filed by Penn Hills police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

  • Jarel Flenory, 34, of Verona on charges of simple assault and harassment. Charges were filed July 26.
  • Ava Malloy, 30, of Penn Hills on two charges of aggravated harassment by prisoner, simple assault, facilitating an escape and careless driving. Charges were filed Sept. 25.
  • Ameile Findley, 19, of Penn Hills on charges of simple assault and harassment. Charges were filed Oct. 22.
  • Thomas Randolph Hardy, 58, of Penn Hills on charges of simple assault, strangulation and harassment. Charges were filed Oct. 22.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Taylor Patrice Hillard, 19, of Penn Hills on charges of obstructing administrative law, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct. Charges were filed Dec. 11, 2017.
  • Sean D. Jones, 46, of Verona on a DUI charge. The charge was filed Sept. 13.
  • Richard Cain, 55, of Penn Hills on charges of simple assault, strangulation and harassment. Charges were filed Oct. 7.
  • Charles Daniel, 52, of Pittsburgh on felonious charges of escape, three charges of fleeing to avoid or elude a police officer, false identification to law enforcement, possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia, driving under a revoked or suspended license, improperly approaching an intersection, failing duties at a stop sign and reckless driving.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, dcarr@tribweb.com or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me