ShareThis Page
Penn Hills

Tax hike could fill Penn Hills budget shortfall

Dillon Carr
| Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2018, 12:09 p.m.
Penn Hills Municipal Complex
Penn Hills Municipal Complex

Penn Hills residents and the mayor spoke in favor of raising property taxes to fill a shortfall in the municipality’s 2019 spending plan at a Dec. 17 meeting.

The proposed $32.6 million budget has a $2.8 million gap, half of which will be covered by funds carried over from the fund balance, leaving $1.4 million unaccounted for.

“I am in favor of the one millage,” Mayor Sara Kuhn said during the municipality’s second budget hearing, during which council members took turns addressing residents’ concerns.

If approved, the millage rate would increase 1 mill from 5.444 to 6.444. The proposed rate would mean the owner of a $100,000 home would pay an additional $8.36 per month, or a total of $100.32 more per year.

A balanced spending plan presented to the public already factors in the 1-mill increase, which Manager Scott Andrejchak has said will generate $1.4 million for the municipality.

Andrejchak has blamed the budget shortfall on higher waste service fees. Council approved a three-year, $10.4 million contract with Republic Services in November, a 43-percent increase from the previous three-year deal.

When the budget first was presented to council and the public in October, Andrejchak gave several options for filling the $1.4 million gap – one of which was raising property taxes.

Other options included raising the earned income tax rate of 1.75 percent to an unspecified number, or having residents pay a monthly fee for the municipality’s waste services. Those rates would start at $16.25 per month in 2019 and climb to $17.93 by 2021.

“I’m not in favor of our rubbish charge because of the fact you will have the same situation as we have when people don’t pay their sewage bill,” Kuhn said, adding the problem could pose a public heath risk.

“Then, what are we going to do with the rubbish all over the streets?” she said.

Some residents were pleased with the municipality’s financial direction.

“It sounds to me like we are the prettiest girl in the ball and we are crying because we broke a fingernail. Truly, we are farther ahead than other communities,” said resident Pauline Calabrese, referring to the municipality’s progress with updating its aging sewage system.

Penn Hills last raised property taxes in 2011, when the millage rate went from 5.35 to 5.60 mills for 2012’s spending plan. In 2013, the millage was decreased down to 5.44 mills, and it has remained the same rate since.

The 1-mill increase, however, would reflect the municipality’s largest single increase since 2003, when council hiked property taxes by 2 mills, from 2.60 to 4.60. That rate remained unchanged from 2004-10, when council raised it to 5.1 mills.

Resident Corey Young said Penn Hills faces “systemic issues” when it comes to its finances, referencing deficiencies found in Penn Hills’ financial audits.

“I don’t think it’s just a trash issue or just a sewage issue. I think it’s a whole host of issues that have culminated, and we’re on the trajectory that that trend may continue for years to come,” Young said.

A copy of the proposed 2019 spending plan can be found on the municipality’s website and is available for public inspection at the administrative building at 102 Duff Road.

A final budget will be voted on at a Dec. 28 meeting, scheduled to start at 3 p.m.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, dcarr@tribweb.com or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me