Feds: Pittsburgh area brothers tried to evade immigration laws with fake marriage | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Feds: Pittsburgh area brothers tried to evade immigration laws with fake marriage

Dillon Carr
1934501_web1_Handcuffs5

Two Indian brothers living in the Pittsburgh area have been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges related to marriage fraud in order to evade immigration laws, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Pittsburgh announced Tuesday.

Makhan Singh, 53, of Monroeville paid a woman to marry his brother, Rajinder Singh, 43, of Pittsburgh, according to investigators.

The woman is not identified and is only referred to as D.H. in court records.

The fake marriage began in 2011, investigators said. The couple staged photos together and opened joint bank accounts to maintain the lie, according to court records.

Makhan Singh made payments to the woman from September 2015 to March 2018 for the alleged fake marriage, investigators said. He also allegedly paid for car insurance on a vehicle that was jointly registered to the woman and Rajinder Singh.

Rajinder Singh also allegedly made false statements to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service in March 2016 and December 2017, according to court records.

Makhan Singh pleaded not guilty last week and was released on a $30,000 bond. His attorney, Michael E. Waltman, was not immediately available to comment.

There is no attorney listed for Rajinder Singh.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.