2 Penn Hills juveniles struck by vehicles in 2 days | TribLIVE.com

2 Penn Hills juveniles struck by vehicles in 2 days

Michael DiVittorio

Two Penn Hills children were struck by vehicles in as many days.

Police Chief Howard Burton said a 6-year-old boy was hit by a car at a bus stop at Frankstown Road and Erhardt Drive early Wednesday morning.

Burton said the bus was headed eastbound along Frankstown Road and boy was struck by a car headed in the opposite direction .

He was taken to a local hospital for evaluation and is expected to recover from minor injuries. It’s unclear what school that boy attended.

Burton said officers received conflicting stories about the incident. The driver told police he was attempting to go past the bus while its yellow lights were on, while the bus driver said the lights were red.

“We’re trying to determine whether the red lights were on or not,” Burton said. “There’s plenty of room to see at that bus stop. Erhardt is very wide. It wasn’t like they didn’t see the bus.”

The incident remains under investigation.

Meanwhile, a Linton Middle School student is recovering from minor injuries after being struck in the school’s parking lot Tuesday morning.

Burton said a driver was going the wrong way in the lot when a boy was hit. He was taken to a local hospital for evaluation and is expected to recover from minor injuries.

Penn Hills School District Superintendent Nancy Hines confirmed the accident at the middle school, but declined further comment due to the ongoing police investigation.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.