Police: 3 people arrested for attempted home invasion in Scott Township | TribLIVE.com

Police: 3 people arrested for attempted home invasion in Scott Township

Tony LaRussa
Ryan Muma (left), Kelsey Carter (right) and Dawn Eckert have been arrested in connection with a home invasion in Scott Township.

Surveillance video was used to track down three people from Butler County who allegedly tried to break into a Scott Township woman’s home by knocking on the door and announcing themselves as police officers.

The investigation began Feb. 20 when a woman along the 500 block of Carothers Avenue reported to police that someone banged on her door saying they had a warrant for her arrest and then began using a knife to try to pry the door open, according to Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV.

The attempted home invasion ended when the woman called police and the suspects fled, according to authorities.

But surveillance video showing the image of a vehicle allowed detectives to track the car to Dawn Eckert, 40, of Boyers, according to investigators. They said the woman was in possession of a “large amount of drugs.”

Police said Eckert admitted to being involved in the attempted home invasion and provided information that led them to Ryan Muma, 23, of Portersville and Kelsey Carter, 26, of Prospect.

Muma and Carter were arrested and charged with attempted robbery and two counts of criminal conspiracy, according to court records.

They are in the Allegheny County Jail after failing to post the $25,000 cash bond set for each of them.

Eckert faces multiple drug charges along with endangering the welfare of children.

She is in the Butler County Jail after failing to post a $100,000 bond.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.