7 arrested in undercover Pittsburgh prostitution sting | TribLIVE.com

7 arrested in undercover Pittsburgh prostitution sting

Matt Rosenberg

Seven people were arrested in connection with a prostitution sting that undercover Pittsburgh detectives began when they saw an online advertisement, Tribune-Review news partner WPXI reported.

The station reported, citing court documents, that detectives found an ad on the website Escort Babylon, responded to it and made arrangements to meet Samuel Snyder at a hotel.

Snyder “agreed to deliver crystal methamphetamine” and asked if he could bring a friend or two, WPXI reported.

Snyder and Jules Williams reportedly showed up at a detective’s hotel room, where they were arrested. Both men were arrested.

Another man, Kevin Fowler, also was in the hotel.

“He paid for the taxi so his two friends could go party with an individual in the room,” police said in the criminal complaint obtained by WPXI. “He stated he knew they were going to engage in sexual acts for money and that he would get money from them to pay for the taxi.”

Four others were charged in related incidents, WPXI reported.

Matt Rosenberg is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Matt at 412-320-7937, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.