7 domesticated ducks rescued from Highland Park | TribLIVE.com

7 domesticated ducks rescued from Highland Park

Madasyn Czebiniak
Pittsburgh Public Safety
Pittsburgh Animal Care and Control officers rescued these domesticated ducks from Highland Park on Tuesday, June 18, 2019.

Pittsburgh Animal Care and Control officers on Tuesday rescued seven ducks in need of a helping hand in Highland Park.

Officers Jeff Ley and Steve Costa, acting on photos posted to Facebook, spent roughly half an hour gathering the ducks, which were let loose illegally in the park, said Cara Cruz, public safety spokeswoman.

The ducks, known as Pekin or White Pekin, are a domesticated breed raised primarily for meat.

They were tame and friendly and wouldn’t have been able to survive on their own, Pittsburgh Animal Care and Control Supervisor David Madden said.

They were taken to Humane Animal Rescue in the East End.

Animal rescues have been a big part of emergency responders’ jobs recently.

On Friday, Pittsburgh officers rescued five ducklings that had fallen into a sewer grate in front of The Waterworks Cinemas near Fox Chapel. On Saturday, Pittsburgh firefighters and police saved 10 ducklings trapped in a sewer along Kalida Drive in Larimer.

On May 8, 10 ducklings were rescued from a West End storm drain. On May 19, Tarentum police Officer Kurt Jendrejewski rescued six ducklings caught in a similar predicament.

Pittsburgh police also helped a turtle found on a Lawrenceville road on June 11.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.