Subscribe Place Ad Buy Trib Photos Readers' Choice Contests
Jobs Homes Autos Classifieds
Trib Total Media Contact Us
Airport authority board member who invested in OneJet resigns | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Airport authority board member who invested in OneJet resigns

Jamie Martines
Jamie Martines
1089264_web1_airport-authority

The vice chairman of the Allegheny County Airport Authority board has resigned.

Robert Lewis submitted his resignation letter to County Executive Rich Fitzgerald on March 22, stating in the letter that he has found “the political environment surrounding public service to have become toxic.”

Lewis could not immediately be reached for comment.

“In my mind, the current culture of public service no longer fosters the core values for which I am willing to serve,” Lewis said in the letter. “I would be remiss to not express grave concern for how my colleagues on the Board will continue to be able to make appropriate and necessary decisions without constant scrutiny and attacks.”

Fitzgerald is considering replacement candidates, spokesperson Amie Downs confirmed Monday.

Lewis, founder of Pittsburgh-based Orbital Engineering, was scrutinized in August 2018 for investing in the failed startup airline OneJet while serving on the airport authority board. He was also a non-voting member of OneJet’s board of directors.

OneJet was sued by the Allegheny County Airport Authority in August in an attempt to recover $763,000 out of $1 million in tax incentives after OneJet failed to launch all of the promised routes.

Lewis did not cast a vote to award the $1 million incentive. He also did not participate in any airport authority board votes related to county or state loans granted to OneJet.

OneJet stopped all flights Aug. 29.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.