Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner looking forward to her trial in Detroit |

Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner looking forward to her trial in Detroit

Tom Davidson
Tom Davidson | Tribune-Review
Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner.

Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner said Friday she is looking forward to going to trial next week on criminal charges stemming from a March 6 confrontation in Detroit with employees of a hotel and police officers.

“Basically we’re looking forward to having everything be fully revealed,” Wagner said. “I certainly anticipate to be found 100% innocent, and I think that’s always been apparent.”

Wagner, 42, of North Point Breeze, and her husband, Khari Mosley, 43, went to Detroit for a Nas concert as a post-Valentine’s Day celebration.

After the show, they returned to the Westin Book Cadillac Hotel in downtown Detroit. Wagner went to her room and went to sleep. Mosley went to the hotel bar and later realized he didn’t have a key to their room.

That’s when a confrontation started, first with hotel staff and security and ultimately with Detroit police. It ended with Wagner being taken to jail in handcuffs.

Wagner and Mosley maintain they are the victims of hotel staff and police who acted improperly. Authorities charged Wagner with resisting and obstructing the police and disorderly conduct, and Mosley with disorderly conduct and disturbing the peace.

Mosley was found not guilty on July 15. Wagner’s trial starts Tuesday in Wayne County Common Pleas Court.

“This had always been a retaliatory story. The charges were filed after they received notice that we were suing them after the abhorrent treatment by the hotel and the mistakes made by police,” Wagner said.

Maria Miller, a spokeswoman for the Wayne County prosecutor’s office, said the trial is expected to proceed.

Wagner was re-elected to her post Tuesday by a large margin.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.