Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner to miss budget hearing because of Detroit trial |

Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner to miss budget hearing because of Detroit trial

Tom Davidson
Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner, right, and her husband Khari Losley talk Saturday, March 9, 2019, about what happened during an on Wednesday at a Detroit hotel that ended with Wagner in jail.

Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner won’t be among the elected county officials Thursday presenting their office’s 2020 budgets to members of county council.

Instead, Wagner will be in Detroit, where jury selection in her trial is expected to resume Thursday on charges stemming from a March 6 run-in with police and hotel staff.

“I’m of course not physically capable of being in two places 285 miles apart at once,” Wagner said in a text message Wednesday.

Wagner said she has managed her office so she can take the day off and attend the trial.

Wagner’s absence will mean she won’t be able to answer questions about the budget herself, said Councilman Sam DeMarco, the Republican at-large member. DeMarco said her absence shouldn’t have an impact on the 2020 county budget process. Most of the details in the 2020 budget have been discussed, and Thursday’s hearing is more of a presentation, DeMarco said.

Other members of her staff will be present to answer questions, Wagner said. The proposed 2020 budget for the Controller’s Office is $7.59 million. It is the smallest budget among the offices presenting Thursday.

District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr., Sheriff Bill Mullen, Common Pleas President Judge Kim Berkeley Clark and Treasurer John Weinstein are scheduled to appear before council to present budgets for their departments.

Wagner, 42, a Democrat from North Point Breeze, was reelected Nov. 5 to a third term as controller.

Wagner’s Detroit trial is on charges of resisting and obstructing the police, a felony, and disorderly conduct from a confrontation at the Westin Book Cadillac Hotel.

In a July trial, her husband, Khari Mosley, was acquitted of charges of disorderly conduct and disturbing the peace from the incident.

The couple contends the charges against them were filed after the hotel and police received notice they were planning a civil lawsuit. Detroit police Chief James Craig has said the charges are warranted.

Wagner rejected an offer to receive non-reporting probation if she would plead guilty to disturbing the peace because she wants to clear her name, she said Tuesday.

The trial is expected to wrap up early next week.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.