Allegheny County Council supports health department’s enforcement actions against U.S. Steel |

Allegheny County Council supports health department’s enforcement actions against U.S. Steel

Jamie Martines
Jamie Martines | Tribune-Review
Allegheny County Council District 3 Councilwoman Anita Prizio accepts a petition demanding clean air prepared by environmental group PennEnvironment at the Allegheny County Courthouse on July 16, 2019.

Allegheny County Council on Tuesday endorsed enforcement actions taken by the county health department to curb air pollution at U.S. Steel’s Edgar Thomson Plant in Braddock and Clairton Coke Works in Clairton.

The endorsement was intended to support the Allegheny County Health Department in its efforts to maintain the standards of the federal Clean Air Act as well as residents “in their fight for cleaner, healthier and more breathable air,” said District 3 Council member Anita Prizio, D-O’Hara, who sponsored the endorsement.

In July, Prizio accepted a petition signed by 6,000 Allegheny County residents across 37 ZIP Codes demanding clean air. She shared that petition, organized by the environmental group PennEnvironment, with county council and the health department last month.

All 15 members of council were present and voted unanimously in favor of the endorsement.

The endorsement vote does not require U.S. Steel nor the Allegheny County Health Department to take any new actions. Rather, it’s a way for council to show support for the health department’s “health-based air quality regulatory actions that aim to bring U.S. Steel’s Edgar Thomson Plant and Clairton Coke Works facilities into compliance for the good of public health,” according to the text of the endorsement.

“This council holds that the proposition that the advancement and improvement of economic growth and environmental health are at odds is a false dichotomy, and this council firmly and resolutely believes the proper governmental bodies must advance solutions to the benefit of all residents and workers involved because those parties are one and the same,” the text of the endorsement said.

Concerns about air quality intensified this year after two fires at the Clairton Coke Works facility knocked pollution controls offline.

Penalties related to the first fire, in December 2018, will potentially be addressed through a federal lawsuit brought by PennEnvironment, Clean Air Council and the health department.

The health department in June reached an unrelated draft settlement agreement with U.S. Steel over 2018 and early 2019 air pollution violations at the Clairton Coke Works.

The draft settlement requires U.S. Steel to pay $2.7 million in fines and to upgrade equipment to reduce future emissions. Public comment on the draft settlement was held in July and is currently being reviewed by the health department.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.