Allegheny County Council to consider another conversion therapy proposal | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Allegheny County Council to consider another conversion therapy proposal

Jamie Martines
1714482_web1_courthouse
Tribune-Review
Allegheny County Courthouse

Republicans on Allegheny County Council introduced an ordinance Tuesday that would ban certain conversion therapy treatments, but not the widely discredited practice itself.

The measure is a response to legislation proposed earlier this year by Paul Klein, D-Point Breeze, and council President John DeFazio, D-Shaler, that would prohibit mental health providers from using conversion therapy, which attempts to remove a person’s feelings of same-sex attraction or to change their gender identity.

The initial proposed ordinance, which has been sitting in the Health and Human Services Committee since March, broadly defined mental health providers as anyone who provides mental health services.

“Councilman Klein and President DeFazio’s bill is too vague,” said Sue Means, R-Bethel Park, the primary sponsor of the new bill.

Her version, co-sponsored by Sam DeMarco III, R-North Fayette, prohibits involuntary treatment. It also prohibits “any therapy method causing physical pain to a minor” — including “electroshocking a minor’s body part; penetrating a minor’s fingers with needles; injecting a minor with drugs to induce vomiting; slapping, hitting, punching, kicking…” or other physical contact that inflicts pain or the fear of pain — but is not an outright ban on conversion therapy.

“Mine is to prevent harmful therapy so that children aren’t physically harmed,” Means said of her version of the bill, adding that she wants to preserve a minor’s right to seek counseling to meet their goals, “whatever those goals are.”

“The other version would limit their ability to set their own goals,” she said.

She also criticized the initial proposal for potentially extending to members of religious clergy, like youth pastors.

Means’ proposal was moved to the Health and Human Services Committee.

Following Tuesday’s meeting, DeFazio said he would review the proposed ordinance.

Klein could not be reached for comment and was absent from the council meeting.

“It essentially bans the harmful methods that are used, not the goals,” said Curtis Schube, an attorney with the Pennsylvania Family Institute.

The conservative, Harrisburg-based organization consulted on the proposed ordinance.

“What it also does is, it protects the minor who wants to have the treatment to get to the goal that they want, and also protects the parental rights to help direct the treatments as well,” Schube said.

Conversion therapy has been discredited by a range of national organizations.

A 2008 report issued by the American Psychological Association and American Academy of Pediatrics takes the position that “homosexuality is not a mental disorder and thus is not something that needs to or can be ‘cured.’”

California, Nevada, New York, Oregon and Washington State, all ban on conversion therapy.

Pittsburgh City Council passed a ban about two years ago, followed by other Pennsylvania cities, including Philadelphia and Allentown.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.