Allegheny County DA joining investigation into Alternative Benefit Systems | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Allegheny County DA joining investigation into Alternative Benefit Systems

Tom Davidson
1938897_web1_WEB-budget

Allegheny County businesses or residents may be caught up in a theft case involving the owner of a Berks County company that administered health care savings accounts, Allegheny County District Attorney’s office spokesman Mike Manko said Wednesday.

Prosecutors in both counties are investigating Alternative Benefit Systems and its owner Amy McLaine.

The Berks County-based company administered flexible spending accounts and McLaine is facing theft charges stemming from checks Alternative Benefit Systems issued to a Berks County company in June, according to a criminal complaint.

The case against McLaine, 47, of Fleetwood, Pa., is in Berks County court.

There is at least one and maybe more potential victims of Alternative Business Systems in Allegheny County, Manko said.

He wouldn’t provide further details, but the DA’s office is asking people who had dealings with the company to call 412-388-5300.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.