Allegheny County releases partial data on swimming pool incident victims | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Allegheny County releases partial data on swimming pool incident victims

Nicole C. Brambila
1775033_web1_gtr-PoolStock
1775033_web1_ptr-appealfollow2-100819

The Allegheny County Health Department has released previously redacted information on victims involved in swimming incidents over the past three years.

The Tribune-Review sought the information in a Right-to-Know request.

The Pennsylvania Office of Open Records decision was a partial win for the newspaper, which sought basic information on 61 swimming incidents from 2016 through 2018, and the county, which redacted the age and gender of victims.

Last month, Open Records ruled that county officials failed to demonstrate lifeguards are not subject to the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, also known as HIPAA, which restricts the release of medical information. HIPAA typically applies to health care officials.

Erin Burlew, the Open Records officer who reviewed the newspaper’s appeal, found the county erred by redacting the information when lifeguards treated victims. The Open Records decision stemmed from the newspaper’s request for non-identifying details about swimming incidents – including three drownings – as part of an examination of pool inspection reports in Allegheny and Westmoreland counties over three years, which found oversight disparities.

The appeal resulted in the county releasing the incident date, gender and age of victims only treated by lifeguards. Those reports account for roughly one in three of the requested reports.

Victims’ ages ranged from 18 months to 50 years old. Of the 20 swimming incidents, eight of the victims were female and 12 male.

Pennsylvania’s leading news association said the ruling was a win for readers and ripe for a court review. Melissa Melewsky, media law counsel for the Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association, questioned how the redacted information would identify swimming pool victims.

It’s unclear whether the Sept. 11 legal decision narrowly defining releasable information will impact hospitals that routinely provide victim gender, age and general health conditions in mass casualty incidents.

The county could have filed an appeal in Commonwealth Court, but elected to release the information Open Records deemed public.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.