Blighted properties in Penn Hills slated for demo | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Blighted properties in Penn Hills slated for demo

Dillon Carr
1721017_web1_php-demolitions02-100319
Dillon Carr | Tribune-Review
The former Sandy Creek Inn at 4813 Verona Road is slated for demolition.

Four blighted properties in Penn Hills, including what officials described as a nuisance bar, are slated for demolition using Community Development Block Grant funding.

Council awarded Lutterman Excavating its $42,790 bid to tear down the structures. The properties include 49 Verona Road, 4268 Verona Road, 4813 Verona Road and 470 Wildwood Avenue.

The building at 49 Verona Road, the former site for Transmissions by Lucille, will require asbestos removal.

The building at 4813 Verona Road was the former Sandy Creek Inn, where a West Mifflin man was shot in December 2013. Johnny V. Johnson, 32, died a week later in the hospital.

Chris Blackwell, Penn Hills’ chief zoning officer, said the structure has been vacant for several years and is in “severely bad shape.”

Blackwell said he rejected the owner’s application for a building permit, an action the owner has since appealed to the Zoning Hearing Board.

“I told (the owner) it’s basically a race. We’re tearing it down and he’s trying to keep it,” Blackwell said.

Neither Blackwell or council included a timeline for the demolitions.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.