ShareThis Page
Boil water advisory remains in effect for 4 Pittsburgh neighborhoods | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Boil water advisory remains in effect for 4 Pittsburgh neighborhoods

Bob Bauder
821106_web1_water-faucet
Tribune-Review
The Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority has lifted a boil water advisory for two city neighborhoods impacted by a broken water main, but it remains in effect for residents of Crafton Heights, Elliott, Ridgemont and Westwood.

The Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority Friday morning lifted a boil water advisory for two city neighborhoods impacted by a broken water main, but it remains in effect for four West End communities.

About 1,700 customers in Crafton Heights, Elliott, Ridgemont and Westwood should continue flushing tap water and boiling it for at least one minute before using it, according to PWSA.

Testing in Mt. Washington and Duquesne Heights has determined that the water in those neighborhoods is free of contaminants. The authority must continue testing water in the other areas before the advisory can be lifted.

PWSA issued a precautionary advisory for about 3,800 customers after a contractor on Tuesday broke a water main while digging on Shaler Street in Duquesne Heights. Spokesman Will Pickering said the authority repaired the break Thursday afternoon and restored water service to about 900 customers who had been without service since the break.

The mishap caused low pressure which can permit contaminants to enter the water.

The city has tanks with fresh water for residents at the following locations:

  • Fire Station 30 at 916 Steuben St., Elliott
  • Fire Station 31 at 3000 Chartiers Ave., Sheraden
  • 1717 Hethlon St., Westwood
  • Springfield and Hamburg Street, Ridgemont

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.