Bond revoked for men charged in $10M cocaine bust in North Braddock |

Bond revoked for men charged in $10M cocaine bust in North Braddock

Megan Guza

A judge on Wednesday revoked bond for two men charged in an alleged large-scale cocaine trafficking operation, calling the men flight risks and a danger to the community.

Jermaine Clark and Terry Suggs Jr. were arrested Monday in North Braddock, the culmination of a months-long investigation into the pair.

The two were stopped driving two different vehicles, authorities said, each of which had a secret compartment containing cash and cocaine.

During regularly scheduled bond hearings on Wednesday, prosecutors asked Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Manning to revoke each man’s $25,000 bond.

Authorities said Suggs’ vehicle contained 18 kilograms of cocaine and $10,000 in cash, and prosecutors said he has a history of federal drug and racketeering charges. In Clark’s vehicle, they found 5 kilograms of cocaine in the hidden compartment and has federal bank robbery charges in his history. They said that within the past 30 days, he’d traveled to both Columbia and Mexico.

Manning revoked the bond of both Suggs and Clark.

The men, both of whom are from Philadelphia, appeared in the courtroom via satellite hook-up from the Allegheny County Jail. Clark attempted to ask Manning how, exactly, he is a danger to the community.

Manning pointed to the more 50 pounds of cocaine worth $10 million found in the pair’s vehicles.

District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. said earlier this week the bust is the largest in recent memory.

“We haven’t taken this much dope off the streets for a long time,” Zappala said Tuesday evening.

Suggs and Clark and both charged with drug possession, possession with intent to deliver drugs and conspiracy.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.