Man convicted of murder in Jefferson Hills motel owner’s shooting death | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Man convicted of murder in Jefferson Hills motel owner’s shooting death

Renatta Signorini
1626775_web1_ptr-Gallawaytrial-082919

A Sacramento, Calif., man was convicted Tuesday of first-degree murder by an Allegheny County jury in the 2016 shooting death of a Jefferson Hills motel owner.

Derrick “Chino” Gallaway, 63, also was found guilty of robbery, theft and tampering with evidence in the death of Denhad Taiedi, 78, at the Jefferson Hills Motel on Route 51.

Gallaway will be sentenced on Nov. 25. A first-degree murder conviction carries a mandatory sentence of life in prison.

Taiedi was found with a fatal gunshot wound to the head on May 27, 2016 at the motel’s front desk where he worked as night clerk. DNA evidence at the scene led police to Gallaway and two witnesses told investigators he tried to enlist their help in a robbery plot after the group used drugs in one of the motel’s rooms, authorities said in a criminal complaint.

Gallaway was charged three months after the killing and was captured in November 2017 at a Sacramento hospital by U.S. Marshals. Trial started last week.

Taiedi and his wife, Linda, purchased the motel in 2001. She died in 2013.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.