Carnegie man who led police on high speed Route 28 chase guilty of heroin distribution |

Carnegie man who led police on high speed Route 28 chase guilty of heroin distribution

Michael DiVittorio

A Carnegie man who led police on a wild high-speed chase on Route 28 in 2015 has pleaded guilty to federal drug distribution charges.

William Thompson, 36, is scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 5 by Senior U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti for possession with intent to distribute heroin.

He was taken into custody Aug. 7, 2015.

Police attempted to stop Thompson that day when he was operating a Porsche Cheyenne without a license.

Authorities said he fled from police along the Route 28 expressway reaching speeds of more than 100 mph.

He sideswiped three vehicles and crashed near the 40th Street Bridge ramp in Millvale.

Thompson ran from the scene.

Officers from Pittsburgh, Millvale, Shaler, Ross and the state police spent hours combing the woods along the Allegheny River and near Millvale Riverfront Park looking for Thompson.

He was eventually captured.

Authorities said investigators recovered more than a kilogram of heroin — worth about $376,000 — from his vehicle.

The FBI Greater Pittsburgh Safe Streets Task Force conducted the investigation that led to Thompson’s prosecution.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.