ShareThis Page
Century III Mall deemed ‘unsafe and uninhabitable’ |

Century III Mall deemed ‘unsafe and uninhabitable’

Century III Mall

West Mifflin Code Enforcement declared Century III Mall unsafe and uninhabitable because of a water and fire suppression system in the building, according to social media posts by the borough.

The borough posted a photo of the notice on Facebook and Twitter.

“This structure is unsafe and uninhabitable. (Its) occupancy is prohibited by the code official,” the notice said.

The mall’s closure is temporary, according to Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV. Once the mall brings the building up to code, it will be able to reopen.

The closure applies only to the internal mall. Anchor stores such as Dick’s and JCPenney are not affected, WPXI reported.

The 1.3-million-square-foot mall opened in 1979 and was sold to Las Vegas-based Moonbeam Capital Investments LLC in 2013. West Mifflin officials said in 2018 the company has not followed through with revitalization promises.

In April, the mall was slated for sheriff’s sale, but the sale was postponed twice, once in June and in September. It is not clear why the sales were postponed.

Moonbeam Capital Investments LLC filed for bankruptcy in September, shortly before the scheduled sheriff’s sale.

In the bankruptcy filing, the mall owed between $1 million and $10 million to almost 50 creditors including Sears, Olsen Restoration in Colorado, West Mifflin Borough, law firm Siegel Jennings Co. and Allegheny County.

The mall’s website lists 14 tenants, 12 of which are closed until officials bring the building to code.

Megan Tomasic and Patrick Varine
are Tribune-Review staff writers.
You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected]
or via Twitter @MeganTomasic.
You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.