Clairton police investigating alleged assault during Tuesday’s protest of Rosfeld verdict | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Clairton police investigating alleged assault during Tuesday’s protest of Rosfeld verdict

Megan Guza

Clairton police anticipate a “lengthy” investigation into the alleged assault of a driver during a protest Monday relating to the acquittal of Michael Rosfeld.

The incident happened about 12:30 p.m. after some Clairton High School students walked out in protest of the verdict, which cleared Rosfeld of any crime in the June 2018 killing of Antwon Rose II.

Some participants allegedly assaulted the driver of a vehicle who came upon them.

“The investigation is anticipated to be lengthy as officers will be reviewing several videos,” said Chief Robert Hoffman. Those videos include police body-worn camera footage from multiple officers.

Investigators are also working to collect witness statements, he said.

Michelle Kenney, Rose’s mother, told Clairton students on Tuesday morning to stay in school, according to Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV.

“When I saw what happened when you guys were marching my heart was breaking,” the TV station reported Kenney telling the students. “It was breaking because I knew it was a situation that could escalate from zero to 100 real quick.”

Kenney sent a similar message to students at Woodland Hills, where her son was a student, on Monday morning.

The department will work with the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office to file charges, Hoffman said.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .


946188_web1_ptr-clairtonprotest-032919
WPXI-TV
Michelle Kenney, mother of Antwon Rose II, urges students at Clairton High School not to walk out for the second day in a row on Tuesday, March 26, 2019.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.