CMU sending rover, art project to moon in 2021 | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

CMU sending rover, art project to moon in 2021

Paul Guggenheimer
1255404_web1_ptr-Cmumoonrover-060619
Carnegie Mellon University
This image shows a four-wheeled robotic rover being developed by CMU alongside the Astrobotic lunar lander. Both are headed for the moon in 2021.

Carnegie Mellon University plans to send a robotic rover and an arts package to the moon in July 2021.

The four-wheeled robot is being developed by a CMU team led by William “Red” Whittaker, a professor in the Robotics Institute. Whitaker described the rover as a “shoebox with wheels.” It weighs only a little more than four pounds and will be equipped with video cameras.

The rover will function as a mobile video platform, transmitting the first ground-level imagery of the site.

The arts package is called MoonArk. It’s the creation of Lowry Burgess, a professor emeritus in the CMU School of Art, and Mark Baskinger, an associate professor in the CMU School of Design. Baskinger calls the project and its contents a capsule of life on Earth, meant to help illustrate a vital part of the human existence.

Both payloads will be delivered to the moon by Astrobotic’s Peregrine lander. Astrobotic is a CMU spinoff company in Pittsburgh’s Strip District. NASA last week awarded a $79.5 million contract to Astrobotic to deliver 14 scientific payloads to the lunar surface, making the July 2021 mission possible. CMU independently negotiated with Astrobotic to hitch a ride on the lander’s first mission.

The Astrobotic landing will be on the near side of the Moon in the vicinity of Lacus Mortis, or Lake of Death, which features a large pit about the size of Heinz Field.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.