Convicted killer indicted on federal drugs, weapons charges |

Convicted killer indicted on federal drugs, weapons charges

Madasyn Czebiniak

An East Pittsburgh man previously convicted of killing his best friend more than 20 years ago was indicted by federal grand jury on drug and weapons charges, according to federal prosecutors.

U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said Douglas Tyrone Williams, 39, possessed with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin, and conspired with others to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin and fentanyl on July 20, 2016.

In addition to a murder conviction, Williams was convicted of aggravated assault and a firearms violation, Brady said. As a felon, Williams is not legally allowed to have guns. Prosecutors said Williams had several guns, including two assault-style rifles, in addition to the drug offenses.

Williams shot Douglas Grinage, 19, of Braddock, in the head on Sept. 20, 1997 as Grinage attempted to break up a fight between Williams and Williams’ cousin.

He was convicted of third-degree murder in 1998 and sentenced to 15-to-40 years in prison, according to court records. He was paroled in 2013.

If convicted on the federal charges, Williams faces 10 years to life in prison and a fine of up to $10.5 million.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.